Alan Couzens, MS (Sports Science)
Last week I wrote a piece on common taper mistakes for the
Endurance Corner website (http://www.endurancecorner.com/Alan_Couzens/race_week_taper).
The piece spawned some great discussion on our EC forum that prompted me to go
into a little more depth on both the practicalities of an optimal taper and the
rationale behind it in this follow up article.
When tapering, an athlete is looking to exploit a key
principle of exercise physiology – that fitness decays more slowly than
fatigue. If we consider performance to be the sum of these 2 components, this
leads us to a ‘sweetspot’ when, after a period of reduced training, fitness
remains relatively high while fatigue is very low & performance is
maximized. An example of this is illustrated below.
I suggested in the article that this sweetspot is a function
of:
·
Fitness – Fitter athletes need shorter tapers.
·
Race type – Shorter events need longer tapers
·
Gender/Body type. – Bigger athletes need longer
tapers.
However, when getting down to the nitty gritty of planning
the contents of the taper, there are other factors that need to be considered. The
first of these is….
Content of the taper weeks by sport.
To complicate matters of optimal tapering, each sport (swim,
bike, run) exhibits different rates of decay for fitness and fatigue, leading
to different ‘sweetspots’ for each sport.
1.
Some time ago, I wrote a piece on using
‘influence curves’ to frame the importance of load through the season (http://alancouzens.blogspot.com/2009/12/influence-curves.html
). We can apply this same concept to the taper to ascertain
the relative benefit of a given swim, bike or run load at various points though
the taper.
Using data from mathematical modelling studies on the
various sports (Busso et al., 1991, 1993, 1997, Hellard et al., 2005, Morton et
al., 1990, Millet et al., 2001, Mujika et al., 1996), I have averaged the
fitness and fatigue constants from each study to produce the following SBR
influence curves.
It should be noted that these studies represent all levels
of athlete from untrained to the very elite, so, as mentioned above, the actual
SBR patterns will also be a function of fitness. But, speaking generally, the
figure below represents the typical influence curves for swim, bike & run
- the curve of maximal impact of load on
performance vs time from performance date.
·
The impact of load on performance is maximized
for all sports at a period of approximately 28-35 days from the competition
date. In other words, for most athletes, the 5th week out should be
a big week.
·
In the 4th week from competition
(days 21-28), the influence of cycling load on performance tends to drop off
more quickly than the other 2 sports. In practical terms, you may want to apply
this by making the 5th week out cycling focused (i.e. a bike camp)
& 4th week out (while still relatively big) more SBR balanced.
·
In the 3rd week out from competition
(days 14-21)the influence of cycling and running load (while still generally
positive), tend to fall at similar rates. This leads to 2 key ‘take aways’ for
this week:
1.
Keep the swim load generally high
2.
If in doubt, leave it out – Load is starting to
trend towards negative at this point & for larger or less fit athletes, may
be approaching negative, so if a session feels tired, this is the week where
more rest may begin to trump more fitness.
·
In the 2nd week out (days 7-14), bike
and run load trends quickly towards negative. Almost all athletes should be
dropping load quickly at this point, from bike and especially from run. Swim load will also start to drop but should
remain relatively high (50-75% of peak)
·
In race week (0-7 days from the event), both
bike and run load will generally have a negative impact on performance. At the
extreme, you may take this to mean (with the exception of a couple of trips to
the pool) that you should spend the time with your feet up in your hotel room,
however, this is a mistake as, when we drill down a little deeper to the
training and detraining rates of the various physiological qualities, you’ll
see that there is one in particular that
the Ironman athlete wants to stay in touch with during race week. I’ll look at
this question of content of taper weeks
by intensity level in my next article on tapering.
Until then, train smart.
AC
No comments:
Post a Comment